PDA

View Full Version : Diet doesn't work in the long run...


John Nguyen
04-11-2007, 05:24 PM
This is the message a group of researchers is sending, saying that not only does dieting not work in the long term, but it is also potentially dangerous for your health.

The study is published in the April edition of American Psychologist, the journal of the American Psychological Association and details the work of researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, who reviewed 31 long-term studies lasting between 2 to 5 years.

UCLA associate professor of psychology and lead author of the study, Traci Mann said: “You can initially lose 5 to 10 percent of your weight on any number of diets, but then the weight comes back. We found that the majority of people regained all the weight, plus more,” she added.

“Diets do not lead to sustained weight loss or health benefits for the majority of people,” said Dr Mann, shattering an age-long belief that restraining from food for a period of time will help a person lose weight – and keep it that way.

The study suggests that whatever benefits there are to be obtained through dieting, in the long run, negative side effects outweigh advantages. Dr Mann and her team analyzed every study they could find that followed people on diets for 2 to 5 years.

Studies that take less than 2 years are “too short to show whether dieters have regained the weight they lost,” they said. They found that it would have been better for most of them if they had not gone on a diet at all.

“Their weight would be pretty much the same, and their bodies would not suffer the wear and tear from losing weight and gaining it all back,” explained Dr Mann. Repeatedly losing and gaining weight has been linked, in previous studies, to cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes and altered immune function.

While people on diets lose an average of 5 to 10 per cent of their weight in the first 6 months, 33 to 66 per cent of these persons regain more than what they lose within 4 to 5 years.

And this is not a complete picture either. The figures do not reflect reality because participants phone or mail their results in themselves, without an impartial assessor. Also, many studies have a below 50 per cent follow up rate; and the people who put on a lot of weight are less likely to stay in touch.

UCLA graduate student of psychology and co-author of the study, Janet Tomiyama said that “Several studies indicate that dieting is actually a consistent predictor of future weight gain.”

She referred to a study that studied links between lifestyle and weight in 19,000 healthy older men over four years. This study found that, “One of the best predictors of weight gain over the four years was having lost weight on a diet at some point during the years before the study started,” she said.

Dr Mann said: “Exercise may well be the key factor leading to sustained weight loss. Studies consistently find that people who reported the most exercise also had the most weight loss.”

The study did not name any diets in particular, but looked at a broad spectrum of approaches. Professor Mann said in her opinion eating in moderation was a good idea for everybody as was regular exercise.

Analisa Naldi
04-11-2007, 11:45 PM
Does this mean that Fran with "Peeps and Cosmo's" is actually good for me?

Gabe Rinaldi
04-12-2007, 02:05 AM
bottom line - behavioral changes that will last the entire lifespan are essential; i.e., eat well and exercise forever! If you eat well temporarily it is a diet, but if you do it for life it is your dietary intake. Analisa I know you're joking, but of course it does not mean that you should simply eat whatever you want because dieting is unhealthy. That's also like saying people who exercise a lot often have nagging aches and pains so it would be better to simply not exercise. This is a belief that was partly shared by a presenter at the IHRSA convention the other week. He was a marketing guru dude with a PhD from Oxford, but he was about 40 lbs overweight. Somebody from the audience stood up and asked him why he didn't exercise. One of his excuses was that all his friends who exercise always have aches and pains. He had several other excuses that were a bit more valid.

Analisa Naldi
04-13-2007, 10:28 PM
I agree with you whole-heartedly Gabe. From experience, I can attest that it is a delicate balance of meeting your appropriate nutrition requirements for whatever your personal performance and visual goals are in conjunction with exercise. (I wrote about it somewhere here on the forum last fall...)
Anyway...I was kidding...thanks! :)

jlorenz
04-17-2007, 04:01 AM
I can attest to the findings in the article.

I was not able to maintain the weight loss with diet alone.

I lost 30 lbs doing the South Beach Diet, only - no extra exercise, in 2005.

I put 20 lbs back on in 2006.

It wasn't until Summer 2006 when I renewed my commitment to low carb eating and started exercising 4 or 5 times a week for an hour each (Hyperstrike and Crossfit) that I have been able to get into some semblance of decent shape.

I agree w/ Gabe that to maintain my recent gains - I need to make the diet + exercise behavioral change a permanent thing.

The advantage of DIET AND EXERCISE is that not only do you reach the desired weight - but you get to the desired weight having also developed strength and vitality and agility and endurance and stamina and cardio-vascular health.

The advantages of exercise can be measured medically as well, in terms of lower resting heart-rate, blood pressure, cholesterol level and blood chemestry, etc.

Is the person who reaches their desired weight by diet alone as functionally strong and as physically able as they would like to be? Can they run or jump away from danger? Can they carry a load? Change a flat tire?

In our mechanized, automated, drive everywhere world, and with the mostly sedentary careers and lifestyles we have around here, I think it is pretty clear, diet alone doesn't do it, even if one COULD stick to the diet permanently.